Death Pledge

So I stated earlier that I might have some news about what has been keeping me busy. Well as of this afternoon I am now the proud owner of a mortgage. We’ll see when the blind fear starts to set in.

Click for the rest of the rambling >>.

Chin takes it on the Po

I have finished Peter David’s Sir Apropos of Nothing Book Three: Tong Lashing. I have reviewed the first and second books previously and given them good marks overall. I’m going to keep the rambling under control on this one. Maybe.

This book continues the telling o the tale as though Apropos is writing his life story later in his life. It goes over the collapse of what happened after the second book and how Po fights the evil Ronnel McDonnell of the clan McDonnel, evil sorcerer turned dungeon master forcing the passengers on the ship LARP to play and RPG that takes their lives if they die in the game. I included that to give you an idea of the type of book this is. Anyway Apropos ends up shipwrecked on the coast of the nation of Chinpan. He stays in a village, but eventually ends up getting swept up into politics, a plot against the Imperior, various criminal organizations, and mystical powers. But all of that really is just Apropos after all.

I really have liked this series. I mean you have the Anaïs Ninjas and the man in charge of palace security is named Go Nogo. I mean come on. That’s funny stuff right there. I don’t know id David is going to write any more of these, but for the end of this on he left the possibility open. If he needs time to get eh plots right then so be it. I’m waiting for the continued adventures of Apropos of Nothing.

Click for the rest of the rambling >>.

Digitized Translocator

I’ve been pretty busy this past week. Hopefully I’ll have good news about that later today. Anyway I went to my parents’ for Father’s Day this past weekend. We went out Saturday and caught “Cars” on the big screen. All in all it’s a pretty standard Pixar film. It’s not great, but it remains very enjoyable. Children should love it, and adults as well, as long at the children can refrain from talking to the screen the entire time. That’s kind of a personal experience there. Anyway, go see it, or at least rent it if you can’t justify the theater expense.

Click for the rest of the rambling >>.

POP!!!

For those that don’t know, I hate cockroaches. Hate! I can handle mice, rats, snakes, worms, many other arthropods, and all sorts of other animals. For some reason cockroaches really bother me. I don’t know if it’s because they are equated with nastiness and disease in my mind, or if I’ve had one too many land in my hair, run over an appendage, or run out from under a chair or toilet upon which I was seated. The title represents the satisfying sound the one I killed tonight made. It decided to hide under the arch of my bare foot, while I was sitting in the den. First one I’ve seen in months. I hate cockroaches.

Click for the rest of the rambling >>.

In The Quiet Place everyone can hear you scream.

I just finished The Quiet Place by Peter David last night. I’m still amazed by how fast this series reads. This makes the seventh in the series.

The book fits in well with a series that is made of books that could each be produced as 3 hour long television episodes. This book ties together a few loose ends form the previous ones and continues character and civilization development. I liked it and still plan on reading the rest of the series.

Click for the rest of the rambling >>.

But that makes sense.

Back in October I mentioned that a vaccine had been developed for several ov the viruses that cause cervical cancer. Ars just had up that the FDA has approved the vaccine for use despite some conservative groups trying to stop it. Chalk one up for common sense and helping your fellow woman and maybe man.

Click for the rest of the rambling >>.

Where in the world is ...

I’ve been pretty busy these past weeks what with a new job and trying to buy a house. So far everything looks good on the job and house front, and I finally managed to finish the book I was reading. I’ve been told I have “interesting” taste in books. I use quotations because I’m not always sure of the intention of that “compliment.” I do take it as a compliment, as I imagine it is usually intended. And even if it isn’t it pisses the person off that I see it as such. In fact I consider myself to have interesting, or what I call varied and broad, taste in many types of things, not just books. It is not nearly as varied as I would like, but time is a constraint. In nonfiction I find myself drawn to history books and books that challenge conventional or powerfully growing schools of thought.

That brings me to why I decided to read Who Stole Feminism?: How Women have Betrayed Women by Christina Hoff Sommers. The first book I read from Sommers was The War Against Boys: How Misguided Feminism Is Harming Our Young Men. I heard of that book in Scientific American, and it intrigued me so much that I sought out this one after finishing it. I’ll ramble on about WSF? and other things for a while.

A few weeks ago I was reading America’s Women: Four hundred Years of Dolls, Drudges, Helpmates, and Heroines by Gail Collins. My mother and brother saw it and mother commented on it. My brother said, in jest to my mother, that I was a feminist. In return I said, “Well yeah I am, but I’m an old school feminist that believes both sexes should have essentially the same rights and opportunities.” It’s kind of funny that WSF was the next non-fiction book on my list to read.

Sommers is a self described feminist. However, she talks of a rift that has formed in the feminist movement creating what she calls gender feminists and equity feminists. She sees herself in the latter category. Equity feminists are the more traditional of the two, and are the category to which I would ascribe myself. Basically EFs want the same rights and opportunities that men have traditionally had in society. They are the ones that fought for the right to vote, own property, get educations, and work at the same level and with the same respect as the men in society.

Gender feminists are the more recent addition. I’m not sure I can sufficiently describe where they are coming from, and being a male I think many of them would say that it is impossible for me to understand it. I’ll take a shot at it none the less. GFs seem to feel that the entirety of current western based society, art, science, math, etc. are constructs of a patriarchal history that has excluded all meaningful input from women and therefore can never represent women equally. They seem to feel that everything in society is arranged to ingrain into men and women that women have a certain place. The only way the situation can be rectified is to throw out all the long held standards of science and art theory and start over creating new standards that put women and “women’s ways of knowing” at the center. If you don’t know what “women’s ways of knowing” are don’t feel strange. I’m not sure I get it either, and I read the book. I think it refers to the idea that women have natural ways of “knowing” things that are different from the male ways on “knowing” that current science, historians, philosophy, etc. use. That’s part of the reason all knowledge needs to be reconstructed.

If you find that previous paragraph strange, then you should be prepared for more throughout the book. Sommers does the same job in WSF? that she does in TWAB. She systematically goes through explaining and deconstructing the arguments and goals of the gender feminists. She shows how they differ from the traditional feminist goals of equality between the sexes, and the feelings of most women and men in the US when it comes to equality. She covers the GF cry for and work towards a deconstruction of the current system, while they offer no clear idea of what should replace it. They just “know” that it will come about. Frankly it sounds like a bunch of idealist hooey to me.

The scary part is the stories of the most prominent studies being designed to give sensational results that support the GF point of view. There is the culpability of the media in republishing the sensational results without checking the validity of the studies or getting comments from experts on both sides, and the lack of experts and respected members of the university system who will stand up to the deconstruction of the curriculums of some institutes of higher education. I don’t blame some of them, because they are generally labeled as anti-feminist and discriminatory. Careers have been ruined by the mere mention of such things.

Anyway, I enjoyed the book and would recommend it and The War Against Boys to anyone interested in feminism or disturbed by some of the recent trends caused by a very vocal and powerful minority of women.

Click for the rest of the rambling >>.